Last Blog Post!

Hello Blog Readers:

I am truly blessed and encouraged that the Most High has used me to reach all of you questioning and transitioning Adventists. Thank you all for taking the time to read the blog and comment on my posts. I have read every one of them, and truly appreciate your comments and criticisms.

I have made the decision to no longer post on the blog, and will shut the page down in the near future.

Although there was so much more that I wanted to post and share concerning false Adventist doctrine, I am grateful that the Father used me to edify His sheep!

Thank you again for stopping by!

Blessings from How To Leave The Adventist Church!

The Bible vs. EGW: Wives HAVE SEX With Your Husbands!

As you can see by the title of this post, this is a hot topic! I must admit that I was not aware of false prophetess Ellen G. White’s teaching on marital excess in the marital sexual relationship. It wasn’t until I began researching Ellen G. White in detail that I learned of some of her more bizarre teachings, and the true reasons behind staple teachings in Adventism.

This post will cover what Ellen White says about sex in marriage, and what the Bible says as well. This post will contain excerpts from White’s writings in ‘Adventist Home.’ As always, please go back and read the entire sections in context. If you do, this topic will be quite alarming [and laughable] at times.

We will start with what Ellen White says, and end on the Word of the Most High. I hope you have your Bible ready. If not, I provide links for you to read the verses online. ‘Adventist Home’ readings can be found online through the White Estate’s website.

Speaking of husbands and wives, Ellen White writes the following in ‘Adventist Home:’

They have united themselves in marriage to the object of their choice and, therefore, reason that marriage sanctifies the indulgence of the baser passions. Even men and women professing godliness give loose rein to their lustful passions and have no thought that God holds them accountable for the expenditure of vital energy, which weakens their hold on life and enervates the entire system. [Adventist Home, p. 122]

Let the Christian wife refrain, both in word and act, from exciting the animal passions of her husband. Many have no strength at all to waste in this direction. From their youth up they have weakened the brain and sapped the constitution by the gratification of animal passions. Self-denial and temperance should be the watchword in their married life. [Adventist Home, p. 123]

What is the result of giving loose rein to the lower passions? … The bedchamber, where angels of God should preside, is made unholy by unholy practices. And because shameful animalism rules, bodies are corrupted; loathsome practices lead to loathsome diseases. That which God has given as a blessing is made a curse. [Adventist Home, p. 124]

Sexual excess will effectually destroy a love for devotional exercises, will take from the brain the substance needed to nourish the system, and will most effectively exhaust the vitality. No woman should aid her husband in this work of self-destruction. She will not do it if she is enlightened and has true love for him. [Adventist Home, p. 124]

The more the animal passions are indulged, the stronger do they become, and the more violent will be their clamors for indulgence. Let God-fearing men and women awake to their duty. Many professed Christians are suffering with paralysis of nerve and brain because of their intemperance in this direction. [Adventist Home, p. 124]

It appears, through White’s writings, that she is admonishing Adventist married couples not to have sex ‘too much’ or in ‘excess’ with each other. White never defines excess. Is that on time per week, two times per month? White herself, mothered four children! So the answer is unclear.

White also writes to Adventist women that they should not tempt or be a temptation to their husbands in a way that would allow the husband to fulfill his sexual desires with his wife. She equates this to a sin when she writes that the couple will have to give an account before God of their marital sexual relationship for “the expenditure of vital energy!”

Laughable isn’t it! I wonder where she read that in her Bible?! [sarcasm] The answer: she didn’t! Even Paul writes that it is better to marry than to burn!

1 Corinthians 7:9: But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.

Suffering from paralysis of the nerve and brain, loathsome diseases?! Was she serious? Moving on…

Let’s start in Genesis shall we!

Genesis 1:28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Proverbs 5:19: Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.

Matthew 19:5-6: And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

1 Corinthians 7:4-5: The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.

1 Corinthians 7:32-34: But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord: But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife. There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.

Hebrews 13:4: Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Ellen White has made the mistake of writing about married couples as if they were single. Her writings on this subject also show that she was unfamiliar and not divinely connected to both the physical and spiritual role that sex plays in a marital relationship.

Paul writes that there is a clear difference between a married and an unmarried man and woman. A single woman concerns herself with the things of the Most High. Paul is not saying that married women do not do this. He is simply saying that when one marries, the paradigm shifts. The married woman concerns herself with how she can please her husband! It is the same for the man!

We even see that reinforced in the Torah, or the instructions, that the Most High made Moses was the custodian of! For a newly married couple, the husband could not be ‘charged with any business.’ He was to say home for an entire year and make his wife happy!

Deuteronomy 24:5: When a man hath taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business: but he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer up his wife which he hath taken.

False Prophet Ellen White also writes a that wives should not tempt their husbands into what she equates to a sin – marital excess [too much sex]. In all honesty, this will lead to adultery and infidelity in marriage! This is why Paul writes:

1 Corinthians 7:1-2: Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman. Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

Please go back and read what the Bible says about this subject, including the entire chapter of 1 Corinthians 7.

Acts 5:29: Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

Joshua 24:15: “…[As] for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”

Grow in Grace and Knowledge!

Thank You Blog Readers!

I would like to thank everyone that the Holy Spirit has led to read this blog. Whether you are a transitioning Adventist, or an Adventist beginning to question Adventist doctrine, I hope that this blog has blessed you on your journey to the truth! 

When I first started this blog, I never thought that I would get such a broad readership base. The Most High has truly blessed! Thank you to everyone in the 45 countries that have read this blog:


  • United States

  • Canada

  • Australia

  • United Kingdom

  • Jamaica

  • Republic of Korea

  • South Africa

  • Philippines

  • Uganda

  • Bahamas

  • Malaysia

  • Germany

  • Romania

  • Guam

  • Switzerland

  • Russian Federation

  • India

  • Zambia

  • Trinidad and Tobago

  • Italy

  • Barbados

  • Finland

  • Egypt

  • Belgium

  • Malawi

  • Bahrain

  • Sri Lanka

  • New Zealand

  • Kenya

  • Botswana

  • France

  • Ireland

  • Namibia

  • Bermuda

  • Saudi Arabia

  • Belize

  • Pakistan

  • Zimbabwe

  • British Virgin Islands

  • Ghana

  • Cape Verde

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

  • Singapore

  • Netherlands

  • Saint Lucia


Stay Encouraged and Grow In Grace! There is definitely more to come!

Still Keeping The Sabbath: Satanism & The False Gospel of Grace

Disclaimer: Please don’t misunderstand this post. The Bible does speak about the Most High’s grace. I am so thankful for His mercy and His grace. Without mercy and grace, I wouldn’t be here! But, grace as it is preached in many mainstream Christian churches, is not taught correctly. It has become a false gospel. This is why I call the mainstream teaching of grace, the false gospel of grace.

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 2 Peter 2:1-2.

A relative of mine died recently. I won’t lie. She had much to repent for. I was traveling to see her before she died. Two of my other relatives who were riding with me were talking about whether or not she asked Yah [God] for forgiveness for her sins. One said that she needed to repent and ask for forgiveness. The other was very adamant that there was no need for her to repent and ask for forgiveness, because Yah had already removed her sins from her. “The Bible says that God will remove your sins as far as the east is from the west.” I was just sitting in my seat listening [and wondering who her pastor was] to their conversation in awe at the relative that said that repentance was not necessary! We’ve all been deceived, but the false gospel of grace has so many people deceived with its, “you don’t have to do anything to be saved” mantra!

During my final months in the Adventist church, the children did three mini youth sermons for youth day. I’ll never forget it. The sermons were done by two boys and one girl. The girl’s sermon was on grace! What she didn’t know is that she was preaching the false gospel of grace…the ‘we don’t have to do anything;’ “don’t you know that His grace is sufficient” lie!

While the rest of the congregation were clapping, hollering, and saying ‘amen,’ I was about to come out of my seat! I was quiet on the outside, but wanting to jump up and down for the Elder assigned to the youth doing the sermon or for the pastor to stop her in the middle of what she was saying so that the congregation could get the proper understanding of grace! I mean, I understood that she was a child, not more than 12 years old. But, someone [the pastor or elder assigned to the youth ministry] should have check her ‘sermon’ to at least make sure that it was in line with the Bible!

Here’s a simple outline of the false gospel of grace for you to beware of:

–We’re no longer under the law.
–We are now under grace.
–You can do what you want.
–You don’t have to do anything to saved.

So many people are deceived by grace. Paul is THE most misunderstood apostle in Biblical history. All of this is completed unsupported by the Bible, as I’ve listed to you above.

According to this false gospel…we are no longer under the law. Isn’t it ironic that man has laws [criminal, civil, federal, state], and Satan has laws, but God supposedly does not have laws?! Now that is certainly a “damnable heresy.”

Don’t believe that Satan has laws…yes he does! Let’s take a look at one of the most popular rap artist today to tell us what Satan’s law is. Ladies and gentleman…Jay-Z…


Do you see what Jay-Z’s shirt says? It says “do what thou wilt.”

As followers of the Messiah, our Bible tells us that it’s not our will to be done. Jesus prayed and taught us to pray for the Father’s will to be done.

Luke 22:42: Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.

Matthew 6:10: Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

The phrase, “do what thou wilt” is short for “do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.” This is a quote from the Book of the Law, which is the Satanic bible! I’m not going to get into why Jay-Z is wearing a shirt quoting the Satanic bible. I’m also not going to link the Satanic bible, or Satanic references on my blog. Please do an internet search of this so that you can see for yourself that what I’m saying is true. There are numerous internet sites and youtube videos on this subject.

Now, let’s recap. The false gospel of grace:

–We’re no longer under the law.
–We are now under grace.
–You can do what you want.
–You don’t have to do anything to saved.

Satan’s Law:

“Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.”

Sounds eerily similar doesn’t it?!

“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” Matthew 6:24

You would be surprised at the number of people who are taught or who believe that they have a ‘free pass’ to do what they want because of the grace of the Most High! Don’t be deceived when leaving Adventism to attend churches that teach and preach this false gospel of grace!

CALL TO ORDER: Your Adventist Baptism Was WRONG! Part I

Here is a challenge to Adventists, or any other Christian denomination that would like to partake. Show me one verse in the Bible where the disciples baptized believers “in the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost,” as Jesus commanded them.

I was talking to a few people that I know recently about baptism. Should we be baptized in ‘Jesus’s name’ or ‘in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost?’ The overwhelming response bordered on “as long as you are baptized.” I was a little shocked! Jesus commanded us to do something; we don’t do it correctly because we miss the point; and now all of a sudden it does not matter? What a twisted world we live in!

All of us are to be baptized ‘in Jesus’s name,’ not ‘in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.’ I just know that everyone is going to Matthew 28:19-20 in their heads right now, and ready to comment below on how wrong I am. But, take Matthew 28:19-20 and look at how the disciples baptized believers. The disciples walked with Jesus, talked with Jesus, and were taught by Jesus. It’s obvious that the disciples understood something then that we completely misunderstand today!

I hope you have your Bible ready!

Matthew 28:19-20:

19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

These are the verses that the Adventist Church [and many Christian churches] use as support for baptizing new members ‘in the name of the Father, and of Son, and of the Holy Ghost.”

Let me ask you a question. What is the “name” of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? Did not Jesus tell us to baptize in the “name” of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? So, what is His “name?” I have a name, you have a name, everyone has a name, and so does “the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.”

Let’s do a little exercise. Let’s pretend that your name is John Doe, and your father’s name is James Doe. Let’s also pretend that Jesus is here talking to you. He tells you, “I want you to go baptize everyone on Earth in “the name of your father.” What do you do? The next person you see, you say “I hereby baptize you “in the name of your father.””

But wait? Doesn’t your father have a “name?” Wasn’t his “name” James Doe? Weren’t you to baptize that believer and say, “I hereby baptize you the name of James Doe?” Did the light bulb go off yet?

Let’s look at how to disciples baptized believers. And, no it wasn’t in the “name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” The disciples baptized in “Jesus’s name” because Jesus IS the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost! HalleluYAH!

Deuteronomy 6:4:

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

1 Timothy 3:16:

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

Now, back to baptism!

Acts 2:38:

Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Notice how Peter did not say be baptized “in the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.”

Acts 8:14-16:

14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)

They were baptized in the Jesus’s name, not the “Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.”

Acts 10:47-48:

47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

They were commanding to baptize in “Jesus name” not “the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.” Remember, Jesus is the Lord!!

Acts 19:4-5:

4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

Again, this is baptism in the name of “Jesus” not the “Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.”

There is something that the disciples understood then, that the masses misunderstand now. We are not to be baptized in the “name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” The “Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost” has a name! Jesus Christ! He IS the “Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.” Jesus was commanding the disciples to baptize in His name! But, sadly, we did not understand what Jesus taught the disciples, or read the rest of our Bibles!

And oddly enough, after hearing and reading this truth, many churches will not change the way that baptism is done! I wonder if their allegiance is to the Word of the Most High, or to the people that sign their paychecks?

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. Acts 5:29.

Stay tuned for Part II: the discussion of Adventist baptismal vows.

Grow in Grace! Please comment below and pass this post around!

Still Keeping The Sabbath: All Has NOT Been Fulfilled!!

As you can see, the title of this blog is ‘How To Leave The SDA Church & Still Keep The Sabbath.’ However, most of my blog entries have been exposing Adventist doctrine and not showing transitioning Adventist that the Sabbath is still valid in present times.

When I was a transitioning Adventist, I was so frustrated on the lack of Sabbath-keeping resources. The most well-known blogs and movements for transitioning Adventists believe the Sabbath has been done away with, and all has been fulfilled.

I even remember listening to audio question and answer materials for transitioning or former Adventists. One question posed to the panel asked about the Sabbath. The moderator told the person that he did not understand the question. When the person attempted to elaborate and expound on his point, the moderator said something to the effect of ‘let’s just stop and move on to the next question.’ The question presented related to how the gentile converts were not required to keep the Sabbath when they were given everything that the Jesus’s disciples had in the faith, which included Sabbath keeping. It was obvious to me, at least, by moving on to the next question that it was on par with saying ‘you still don’t get it, now on to the next question.’ How rude! What an injustice, especially when the moderator was the one who ‘didn’t get it!’

Hopefully, my posts in this series can provide some insight into the Sabbath. The first post in the series will be two questions for you to consider. I will follow-up with the remaining posts on the law and the Sabbath.

The most common place that First Day keeping-former Adventists begin is by saying that Jesus fulfilled everything at the cross. [Maybe I should do a post about how Jesus was not crucified on a cross, but actually on a tree. Comment below if you are interested in another post that will provide Biblical support for this.] Many will even use the verse that I will use here, and grossly miss what is directly written in front of them. Like the old saying goes, “if it were a snake, it would have bit me!” I hope you have your Bible ready!

Let’s turn to everyone’s favorite verse, Matthew 5:17-18:

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Let’s start with verse 17. [A more detailed post on the law will come later.] Jesus said that he did not come to do away with the law or the prophets. Mainstream Christianity will have you believe that we are no longer under the law, because all was fulfilled at the cross and/or the resurrection. But in verse 17, Jesus said that he did not come to do away with the law or the prophets, he came to fulfill the law and the prophets.

Let’s go to verse 18. Jesus is saying that until heaven and earth pass away (are no longer here), not one “jot” or “tittle” will be taken away from the law, until (going back to verse 17) the law and the prophets are fulfilled. Let’s take a look at what a jot and tittle are.


The word “jot” is Strong’s number G2503.

Strong’s gives the definition as “the Hebrew letter `, the smallest of them all a) hence equivalent to the minutest part.”

The Hebrew letter is called “Yodh” which is the 10th and smallest letter in the Hebrew alphabet. Do you see how small the symbol for Yodh is in the Strong’s definition? I even bolded it, and it’s hard to see that it is indeed bolded.


Tittle is Strong’s number G2762. Strong’s gives the definition of tittle as:

1) a little horn

2) extremity, apex, point

a) used by grammarians of the accents and diacritical points. Jesus used it of the little lines or projections, by which the Hebrew letters in other respects similar differ from one another; the meaning is, “not even the minutest part of the law shall perish.”

Here is a picture of a “tittle” that I found online. I hope that it’s big enough for you to see the tittle. It is very small.


Now that we know what a jot and tittle are, back to verse 18. Jesus is saying that until heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle (the smallest part or portion) will be removed from the law until everything is fulfilled. Now, here is the first question that I want you to think about until my next post.

Have heaven and earth passed away?

Let’s look at verse 18 again! Like I said earlier, “if it were a snake, it would have bit me!”

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Here is a little exercise that I would like for you to do. Go outside and stand still. Next, look up at the sky. When you go outside to stand, you are standing on earth. When you look up to the sky, you are looking toward heaven! Even though we can’t see it, on the profession of our faith in the Messiah, we know that it is there! Praise the Father!

So, if we are standing on earth, and looking toward heaven, how have heaven and earth passed away? Students of the word know that John, in the book of Revelation (reference Chapters 20 and 21, but please read the entire book), saw heaven and earth pass away, and a new heaven and a new earth after Jesus’s 1,000 year reign!

Revelation 21:1And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

Has that happened yet? No! We would have to go through the tribulation and every eye would have to see Jesus coming in the clouds of glory for us to even get to the start of Jesus’s 1,000 year reign!!

Now we know that ALL has not been fulfilled, like many people would have us to believe. Have somethings been fulfilled? Yes. Has ALL been fulfilled? No!

Here is the final question that I would like for you to consider until my next post in this series.

Why does mainstream Christianity, and many pro-first-day worship transitioning Adventist sites, want you to think that ‘all is fulfilled,’ when it is clearly unsupported by the Bible?

I can almost guarantee that if you give this exercise listed above with Scriptural support [or share this post], that you’ll witness those individuals telling you that ‘all has been fulfilled’ will start to back-peddle and qualify their statements with what has and hasn’t been fulfilled IF they are students of the Bible and not simply regurgitating what their pastors say in the pulpit.

Please comment below! I would love to hear your thoughts on this subject! Feel free to pass this post around!

Grow in Grace!

The Bible vs. Ellen G. White: Dogs Did NOT Eat Judas’s Body After Death!

Welcome back to The Bible vs. Ellen G. White. If this is your first time reading posts in this series, we will go through the writings of Ellen G. White to show you how she contradicts the Bible. Major contradictions are included in the “Call To Order” series. Click here to read the first post in the series: “The Bible vs. EGW: Adam Was NOT Deceived. It Was Eve!”

Since we started in the Old Testament, let’s make a New Testament transition. Here’s the question: ‘Did dogs eat the body of Judas after he died?’ Well, prophetess Ellen G. White says yes in Desire of Ages, page 722!

“Judas saw that his entreaties were in vain, and he rushed from the hall exclaiming, It is too late! It is too late! He felt that he could not live to see Jesus crucified, and in despair went out and hanged himself.

Later that same day, on the road from Pilate’s hall to Calvary, there came an interruption to the shouts and jeers of the wicked throng who were leading Jesus to the place of crucifixion. As they passed a retired spot, they saw at the foot of a lifeless tree, the body of Judas. It was a most revolting sight. His weight had broken the cord by which he had hanged himself to the tree. In falling, his body had been horribly mangled, and dogs were now devouring it. His remains were immediately buried out of sight; but there was less mockery among the throng, and many a pale face revealed the thoughts within. Retribution seemed already visiting those who were guilty of the blood of Jesus.”

But, what does the Bible say…not what Ellen G. White said. I hope you have the Bible ready.

Let’s turn to Matthew 27:1-6.

When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death:

2 And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor.

3 Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders,

4 Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that.

5 And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.

6 And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.

Now, let’s turn to Acts 1:16-20.

Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.

17 For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry.

18 Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.

19 And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.

20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his bishoprick let another take.

So, no where in the Bible can we find that dogs at the body of Judas. Hmmm…I wonder where EGW got that from?

Grow in Grace! Please comment below, and tell how this post has blessed you!


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.