CALL TO ORDER: Jesus Christ is NOT Michael the ArchAngel!

“Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind.” Colossians 2:18

A Google search of “Is Jesus Christ Michael the Arch Angel?” will yield 2,510,000 results! Why do so many people want to know the answer to this question?

Michael the Archangel is only mentioned five times by name in the Bible. Not one of these mentions state that Jesus Christ is Michael the Archangel. Let’s take a look!

VERSE

BIBLE READING

Daniel 10:13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.
Daniel 10:21 But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.
Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
Revelation 12:7-9 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

So, where does this teaching that Jesus Christ is Michael the Archangel come from? The answer is, of course, from the church’s false prophet, Ellen G. White.

I was stunned when I found out that virtually only Adventist and Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Jesus Christ is Michael the ArchAngel. Both religions coincidentally spun out of the early Millerite movement! Let’s take a look at Ellen White’s writings!

“There is none that holdeth with me in these things but Michael (Christ) your prince.” [Desire of Ages, p.99]

“Michael, or Christ, with the angels that buried Moses, came down from heaven, after he (Moses) had remained in the grave a short time, and resurrected him, and took him to heaven.” [Spiritual Gifts, Volume 4a, p.58]

Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Michael the Archangel, but Ellen White says that the two are equal. This has caused so much confusion, and a twisting and distorting of the Bible.

Even Adventists are confused. Let’s take a look an original post on an Adventist site begins with the obvious question:

Picture 10

Why yes, Adventists do have it wrong! Portions of my original posts were listed as a response to the question! This posting will cover biblical support for Jesus Christ NOT being Michael the ArchAngel, and counterarguments to other responses in their post.

If we follow the Adventist logic that Jesus Christ is Michael the Archangel, and according to 1 Timothy 3:16 Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh–then it must logically follow that God Himself is an angel OR some type of angel, or created being, which we know is impossible!

The first chapter of Hebrews instructs us on the difference between the angels and the majesty of Jesus Christ:

“Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they. For unto which of the angels said he at anytime, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a Son? And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.” Hebrews 1:4-5.

“To which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?” Hebrews 1:13. The answer of course is NONE!

Much of the Adventist reasoning is circular in nature. It begins with the premises that Michael is already proven to be Jesus Christ. From that beginning premise, many Adventists will connect Christ with Scriptural references to Michael the ArchAngel. That a big ‘NO NO ‘on the logic front!

Many Adventists use 1 Thessalonians 4:16 to justify that Jesus and Michael the Archangel are one in the same. The verse reads, “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:”

There are Adventists that say that Jesus will descend from heaven with the voice of the archangel; so that must mean that Jesus is Michael the Archangel! NO IT DOES NOT!

This is a misinterpretation of the verse! Let me ask you this. The verse also says that Jesus will come with the trump of God. Does that mean that Jesus IS the trump of God! Certainly not! Does mean that because Jesus is coming with the voice of the archangel that He is the archangel?! Certainly not!

Now, let’s do a little cross-referencing!

Matthew 16:27 reads, “For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.”

Mark 8:38: “Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”

2 Thessalonians 1:7: “And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels.”

From cross-referencing and reexamining 1 Thessalonians 4:16, the verse simply means that when Jesus returns, He will bring his angels with him, and the Archangel will announce His return.

Adventists believe that John 5:25-29 is also evidence that Jesus Christ is Michael the ArchAngel. It reads:

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.”

Again, this notion that Jesus Christ is Michael the ArchAngel is unsupported by the Word! John 5:25 references the voice of the Son of God only! I’m not sure why would a person connect this with 1 Thessalonians 4:16 discussing the voice of the ArchAngel! The voice of the ArchAngel and the voice of the Son of God are two different things. Does Michael have the authority to execute judgment?! No!!

What is an ArchAngel? Who exactly is Michael the ArchAngel?!

Strong’s 743 tells us that an ArchAngel is the chief of the angels.

Michael in Hebrew means “He who is like God.” BUT, Michael is neither God nor Jesus Christ. Michael the ArchAngel protects Israel and his role is amplified in the end times!

Let’s take a look at Daniel 10:13. “But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.” Michael is “one of” the chief princes!!!

What Adventists fail to realize in Daniel 10:13 is that Michael is “one” of the chief princes. The original poster on the online site presented an article where the writers addressed this, but did so incorrectly:

Picture 11

It’s not an “unfortunate translation” at all. It’s the correct translation! I hope I’m not the only one that caught how the writers said “which also means first.” Echad does mean first, but it “also” as other meanings that were conveniently left out!

The Hebrew word echad, Strong’s number H259, has several meanings: ” 1) one (number); a) one (number); b) each, every; c) a certain; d) an (indefinite article); e) only, once, once for all; f) one…another, the one…the other, one after another, one by one; g) first; h) eleven (in combination), eleventh (ordinal).”

The writers of the article are using the definition that suits them! Strong’s makes it clear that only four verses in the book of Daniel where echad is translated to mean first. Daniel 10:13 is not one of them! Here are the Strong’s results that yield only four verses in Daniel 1:21; 9:1; 9:2; and 11:11 that translate echad to mean first!

Let’s take a journey back to the article excerpt above. “Chief,” Strong’s 7223 as used in Daniel 10:13, comes from the word ri’shown. It has been translated as meaning: “1) first, primary, former; a) former (of time); 1) ancestors; 2) former things; b) foremost (of location); c) first (in time); d) first, chief (in degree).” It is used in Daniel 10:13 as “chief.”

In Daniel 10:13, echad is translated as ”one (number).” Michael is but ONE of the CHIEF ArchAngels! What does that do to the Adventist argument that Jesus Christ is Michael the ArchAngel? Destroys it!

Michael is categorized in a group of his peers. Of this I am confident, Michael cannot be equal to Jesus! Especially if there are others who are equal to Michael. The other chief princes must be equal to Jesus as well. 1 Timothy 3:16 tells us that Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh! Michael means “he who is like God” not “he who IS God.” For those of you who are Bible scholars, students of the Apocrypha, and other Biblical materials, you already know the names of several other ArchAngels! But, this other information is certainly another post!

Many of the Adventists points play the “connect the title” game. Strong’s G743 tells us that an ArchAngel is the chief of the angels. Posters pointed out that the Joshua 5 account of that “the captain of the host of the LORD,” the pre-incarnate Jesus, spoke with Joshua. They mistakenly equate the word “chief” to mean “captain,” which led them to erroneously believe that Michael and Jesus are the same.

We know that there is more than one chief of the angels, or ArchAngel from studying Daniel 10:13. The “captain of the hosts of the LORD,” is above ALL angels!

So again, I ask, if Michael is only mentioned five times by name, where in the world and on whose authority does Ellen White, believe she can label Jesus Christ, Michael the ArchAngel?!

A final word to Adventist teaching AND not correcting this false doctrine: “Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.” Matthew 22:29. “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” Mark 7:7.

About these ads

12 responses to this post.

  1. Don’t forget to check out Dr Barkhuizen’s manuscript at http://www.adventistalternative.org. Perhaps you could post it on your site.

    Reply

  2. [...] I started the blog, redacted portions of my piece on CALL TO ORDER: Jesus Christ is NOT Michael the ArchAngel  were posted on an Adventist site. The poster got hounded for agreeing with it! Hounded is an [...]

    Reply

  3. For purely scriptural references on Jesus being Michael the Archangel, please see the following:

    http://www.remnantofgod.org/Michael.htm

    Note that NO Ellen G White quotes are used.

    Also, remember that Hebrews 1 tells us angels are messengers, Jesus IS a messenger, but not a created angel.

    Reply

    • Thanks for visiting the blog and for responding! I’ve read you post, and can’t say that I agree with your conclusion or analysis. The Bible tells us to earnestly contend for the faith, so that is what I intend to do here in a short rebuttal. I pray that you have an open mind.

      Here are a few quick points that I would like for you to consider!

      You say here that Hebrews 1 tells us that angels are “messengers.” Nowhere in Hebrews 1 is the word “messenger” mentioned. Angels are “ministering spirits” to those that will inherit salvation.

      Hebrews 1 also gives us key instructions on the differences between angels and created beings. The problem that most people who believe that Jesus is Michael is that they see the word “angel” in reference to Jesus (the pre-incarnate) Christ and run with it. Unfortunately, the problem with out Bible is that it can be poorly translated. We see one word, but it has two meanings and is used two different ways. We continue to see the same word, but can’t play the “connect the title game” as I’ve mentioned above, without regard for the two meanings of the word!

      Your post lists a lot of verses that play the “connect the title” game, which many Adventists [even though you are not one] do to get to the conclusion that Michael is Jesus Christ the Archangel. I have listed many points that rebut you claims that Jesus is Michael.

      By the way, do you know the real reason that Adventists and JW’s believe that Jesus was Michael going back to those early Millerite days and before? If you don’t please look into it! I can’t speak for the JW’s but as far as Ellen White is concerned, it fits a pattern with hers. If you decide to dig a little deeper, please come back and comment.

      Just a few points on your post that I would like to mention, though not all because this reply would be too long!

      – When you see the word angel, it has two meanings. One meaning is “messenger” of God, and the other is the word angel, as in a created being. There are several Biblical verses in which Jesus is referred to as an angel (but only a messenger), but you can’t connect those to verses discussing angels that are created beings.

      –Also, Michael’s name does not mean “who is like God” in that he and God are the same, as you try to make this connecting in your post. I’ve seen several definitions of the name Michael. It’s not the one I post here, which I don’t have any problems with. But if you use your definition, you did not apply it the correct way. Think of it as a question being asked, not as a statement of comparison.

      –In your post, you also try to create parallelisms between Zachariah 3 and Jude 1:3 to say that Michael and Jesus are the same. Just cause two “people” rebuke Satan the same way, does it make them the same? No! You also have no support for this other than both Michael and Jesus rebuked Satan. Like I’ve said in the above post, that’s a “no no” on the logic front.

      –I’ve also given the analysis of Daniel 10:13 and echad here that refutes your post that the word means first in that verse. You base some of your arguments on this. Michael being the highest of the chief angel is speculation. Michael is “one of the chief princes.” We have no indication that he is THE chief prince!

      You also speculate that “first” means “highest”.

      Where did you read that in your Bible or find a Strong’s reference that would support Daniel 10:13 having this meaning? I submit to you that there is none.

      –”Prince of princes” is not a title that Jesus was given, only the “Prince of Peace.” So to say that Jesus is the “prince of peace” and that Michael is one the chief prince is playing the “connect the title game,” even with the verses that you provide.

      –You also say in your post that Jesus has “wings.” Wings in that sense means “covering” or covering from a piece of clothing. David also wrote “wings of the wind!” Does that mean that the wind has wings like an angel? No! I say this to show you that the verses that you give for wings, uses wings to mean different things than “angelic wings” that we normally think of. Please run a few references for this. Again, this goes back to how we see one word and assuming that is has only one meaning.

      –Joshua 5 only speaks of Jesus himself. One of the chief princes” and “captain of the hosts of the LORD” are two different things. Please run Biblical and Strong’s references for these as well. There are different classifications of angels [created beings]. As I’ve stated above the captain of the host of the LORD is above all angels! Chief prince, does not mean the highest angel. As I’ve said before echad in Daniel 10:13, does not mean first, nor can you can’t make a Biblical connection that first means “highest” as you’ve said in your post. As stated, I submit to you that first in numerical terms does not mean the highest in status.

      For instance, if we’re in the army and there is a 2nd Lieutenant. If a regular Lieutenant shows up, does that mean that he is in the highest of all the armed forces? [The parallel here is that you write that Michael is one of the chief princes so he must be over ALL of the angels, or as Joshua says that captain of the hosts of the LORD"]

      No! The Lieutenant Commander is above the Lieutenants, then the Commander, and on up until we get to the Admiral. I hope you catch my point. Just because Michael is a chief prince, does not mean that he is the Highest Angel in heaven, let alone Jesus Christ! There is no Daniel 10:13 connection that echad means first, or that first means highest. You feed off of this in your argument that highest means that Michael is Jesus in Joshua 5 when you’re house isn’t built on the rock from the beginning!

      Please go back and reread my post, your post, and this reply. Please pray for discernment of the spirit while doing so. Like the Bible says, try the spirits and see if they are of the Most High! I pray that the Spirit moves in you and your eyes are opened to His truth! I use to believe as you do, which is why I am so passionate about helping others come to the light. In time, with much prayer and study, you will begin to dissect your own argument and the arguments of others. When you get down to it, you’ll find that there is no support for Michael being Jesus Christ!

      Reply

  4. I pray neither of us become prideful and stop reading messages in their entirety. May we be bereans. Excuse my spelling.:)

    I posted the link so I will not comment too much. I stand corrected about the word messenger in Hebrews. Honest mistake.,but to clear up one thing for sure as I mentioned above , I do differentiate between created angels and Jesus who is mentioned as an angel but who is clearly the “the great I AM THE SELF EXISTANT ONE”
    The word echad in dan 10 :13 by strongs def means “number one or first”. That is from strongs h259.
    So we see that Daniel 10:13 says ” But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one (or the first/ numero uno) of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia

    You said “Michael’s name does not mean “who is like God” .?
    Strong’s H4317 – Miyka’el …1.Michael = “who is like God”

    As for Jesus being God the father. I cannot see that in scripture.

    1 John 5:7 “For there are THREE that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
    This oneness is unity just as Jesus wants us to be one with him as he is with the father, but this is a Godhead issue and think it should be left for another blog.

    Jesus also shouts with voice of arch angel and Michael is only arch angel in bible Just to note> archangel in strongs says…Strong’s G743 – archaggelos 1.archangel, or CHIEF of the angels……Is not that amazing ?!

    NOTICE BELOW THAT MICHAEL IS THE ARCH ANGEL AND JESUS SHOUTS AS THE ARCH ANGEL. THEY ARE ONE AND TTHE SAME….
    •1 Thessalonians 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
    •Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

    Gods blessings!

    Reply

    • I did read your post in its entirety.

      The reason that I included in my reply the difference between angels and created beings is because you are using verses related to Michael, a created being, and Jesus Christ! Remember, we have differences of opinion on this topic. :-)

      I never said Michael’s name doesn’t mean, “who is like God.” I simply said that you are using the definition to say that the two are the same, and not different. I also said that there are other schools of thought on using “who is like God” as the definition. In that case, it is more like a question instead of a statement.

      You’re strong’s reference for Daniel 10:13 is still incorrect. I’ve posted it in the original post, but will do so again here. There are multiple definitions for echad.

      As I’ve said in the original post:

      “The Hebrew word echad, Strong’s number H259, has several meanings: ” 1) one (number); a) one (number); b) each, every; c) a certain; d) an (indefinite article); e) only, once, once for all; f) one…another, the one…the other, one after another, one by one; g) first; h) eleven (in combination), eleventh (ordinal).””

      Strong’s goes so far as to tell you which definition of echad (a through h) is correct for whatever verse that echad is used in. Daniel 10:13 is not the verse where echad is used to mean first! Again, please run the proper reference for yourself!

      I’m not sure what you mean by the “As for Jesus being God the Father” statement. I don’t recall making that statement. I’m also unsure of your point for making it, but since you did: 1 Timothy 3:16; John 1:1; and John 1:14. I’ve slightly tackled this in my post, “CALL TO ORDER: Your Adventist Baptism Was WRONG Part 1.” If you have time to read it, please read it. Although Trinitarian and Unitarian doctrines were not the point of me writing the post…

      I think we will be in a back and forth over Jude 1:9; and 1 Thessalonians 4:16. I believe my post and first reply sum it up nicely!

      Grow in Grace and keep reading the blog!

      Reply

  5. To clear up why I said Jesus is not God the father is because you said:
    “Also, Michael’s name does not mean “who is like God” in that he and God are the same” Christ is in no way God the father.

    Maybe I mistaked what you are saying ,but I believe Michael means “one who is like God the father” I believe that is in line with the bible

    Reply

  6. Humor me please and read these verses again.

    “And from Jesus Christ, [who is] the faithful witness, [and] the first begotten of the dead, and the PRINCE of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood…” Revelation 1:5.
    “Him hath God exalted with his right hand [to be] a PRINCE and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.” Acts 5:31.

    BELOW YOU SEE THAT MICHAEL IS THE NAME OF THIS PRINCE
    “But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and [there is] none that holdeth with me in these things, but MICHAEL your PRINCE.” Daniel 10:21.
    “And at that time shall MICHAEL stand up, the great PRINCE which standeth for the children of thy people…” Daniel 12:1.

    ALSO REMEMBER JESUS HAS THE VOICE OF THE ARCHANGEL WHO THE BIBLE ONLY REFFERS TO AS MICHAEL. NOTICE BELOW JESUS SHOUTS AS THE ARCH ANGEL. THEY ARE ONE AND TTHE SAME….NO CREATED ANGEL CAN RAISE THE DEAD WITH THEIR VOICE ONLY LORD GOD MICHAEL OUR PRINCE AND SAVIOUR! :)
    •1 Thessalonians 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

    THERE IS MUCH MORE TO SAY TO PROVE BUT I WILL ALOOW MATHEW HENRY TO COMMENT
    “Michael signifies, “Who is like God,” and his name, with the title of “the great Prince,” points out the Divine Saviour. Christ stood for the children of our people in their stead as a sacrifice, bore the curse for them, to bear it from them. He stands for them in pleading for them at the throne of grace. And after the destruction of antichrist, the Lord Jesus shall stand at the latter day upon the earth; and He shall appear for the complete redemption of all his people…” –Matthew Henry’s Commentary on Daniel 12:1-4

    ONE LAST THING!!!!!! THE GENEVA BIBLE COMENTARY 1599 STATES MICHAEL IS JESUS. SEEMINGLY OUR FORFATHERE KNEW THIS TRUTH. CLICK ON LINK AND SCROLL TO BOOTTOM OF PAGE YOU WILL FIND A COPY OF IT.
    http://remnantofgod.org/images/Geneva1599.jpg

    Reply

    • I’ve read the verses and it is not convincing. Michael the ArchAngel is not Jesus Christ. I can’t speak for your source, but be careful of who you listen too. Always look at where a belief comes from. Michael being Jesus Christ is not a Biblical belief, but a man made belief.

      Many of the people in those early movements (and before the “movements” began) did not believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God. They thought Him to be more than merely man, and believed Him to be Michael the ArchAngel. They twisted the Scriptures and remaining Bible verses to support their original belief! It is not Biblical, but a connect the title game as I have been saying all along.

      Saying that Jesus was Michael the ArchAngel was a way for those individuals to find a status for Jesus as more than man, but less than the Son of God that He is—simply because they did not believe Him to be the Son of God!

      This is the foundation for all of their connect the title and Bible verses games that people still use today! These verses do not support Jesus being Michael the ArchAngel because they cannot and were not meant to say or support that belief! The two are different! One divine, and one created! He is the Son of God, period!

      Anything else is preaching another Jesus, which was originally what those people were doing! What many don’t understand is that by holding these two beliefs, they are doing the same thing!

      Once they accepted Jesus’s true identity, they recognized Him as such. But they still kept his identity as Michael the ArchAngel. They never divorced the two! But rather held on to their original belief!

      One thing they forgot is that no man can serve two masters!

      Do more research on this, and you will find the truth! Remember, a lot of religions came out of those movements!

      Grow in Grace!

      Reply

  7. Daniel 10:21 says, “But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.” Notice here that the angel refers to Michael as your Prince. Who was Daniel’s prince? In the previous chapter, we see the answer. In Daniel 9:25, Daniel’s Messiah is called the prince, which is another clear indication of Michael’s identity! So Gabriel is saying that Michael the archangel is Jesus, who knows all the truth of Scripture.

    Blessings and Happy Sabbath from Miami Florida!:)

    Reply

  8. Posted by Chemarin on November 15, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    EXCUSE-ME BUT YOU ARE NOT RIGHT? JESUS-CHRIST IS “THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL”

    ARCHE = LEADER, HEAD

    ARCHANGEL= LEADER OF THE ANGELS

    SO JESUS-CHRIST IS NOT a CREATURE, HE IS THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD, AND HE IS GOD IN INFINITY AND HE IS ALSO NAMMED “MICHAEL”

    Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

    tthe word “one” can be translated “first”

    OK ?

    ONLY MICHAEL OR JESUS WITH HIS ANGEL CAN fight and win Satan and his supporters, BECAUSE
    HE IS THE WORD OF GOD(REVELATION 19)AND THE KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

    And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
    [18] That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.
    [19] And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
    [20] And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
    [21] And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

    And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.MATH.24

    DANIEL 12 AND ESAIE 2

    And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

    And the idols he shall utterly abolish.
    [19] And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.

    REVELATION 22
    He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

    YAHWEH SAVIOR = JESUS-CHRIST = MICHAEL

    BE BLESSED BY THE LORD

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: